School districts, states and even the Federal Department of Education have rolled out initiative after initiative after initiative in
schools. These initiatives come with programs, protocols, procedures and all
have intentions of improving student learning at some level. Many of them are
conceived with the best intentions in mind. The creators of any one of these
programs or plans were interested at some level in making school better for
kids. You can define "better for kids" in a lot of different ways. We
want to make schools safer. We want to allow more collaborative work for
teachers. We want to increase student test scores. We want to prepare kids for
college and career. We want a great many things for our students and teachers
and we put in place many plans and initiatives to attempt to do this. In schools we have a plan or a procedure for
just about anything we think can and will happen. On paper many of them
look really good.
However, a vast majority of them fall apart or are not
effective in the manner in which they were intended. The simple reason behind
this is often not a fault with the plan or the program but rather the people
involved. I have spent countless hours of my career being professionally
developed or trained on any one of these new programs or initiatives. Yet many
of them fail to reach their intended results when it comes back to a building
level because of the people actually responsible for the follow through and
execution. At the end of the day there are some people that just don't have any
interest in following the plan or getting on board.
You can look at Common Core as a contemporary example of
this notion playing out in schools. Many districts have gone through curriculum
review and are implementing new Common Core aligned units of study. Yet, even
with new standards and new curricula, there are still teachers refusing to
change or incapable of changing. They are holding on to their old ways and refusing to adapt or change for the sake of the students. Much of the failure I have seen with the new
standards has little to do with the standards but rather with the individuals
attempting to implement them. From PLCs and special education to BYOD and
flipped classrooms, there is a program or initiative for everything and they
depend on the people involved to make them succeed. It doesn't matter how good a plan is if you have the wrong people.
I wonder if we shifted our energy and resources away from
programs and initiatives and into hiring and inspiring the right people we
might be better off. How can we get to a place where we are constantly
improving the level of teaching and learning through ensuring the right people
are in our buildings rather than trying to change those who are already there and resistant to change?
If we want to look at impacting students it is the people not the programs that
will do that. Programs are important. Procedures are needed. Protocols must be
in place. However, none of them are worth the paper they are written on if you
don't have the right people in place to do the work
No comments:
Post a Comment